Thai SEC Canvasses Opinion Proposed Crypto Staking and Lending Ban

The Thai Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has approved regulations prohibiting digital asset operators from providing or supporting digital asset deposit services that pay returns to depositors.

In the announcement on its website, the SEC also said it would be welcoming opinions on the principle, which it said it enacted at a meeting on Sept. 1 in order to protect traders and the public from the business risks posed by the service providers.

Thai crypto prohibitions

The official prohibition notice posted on the financial regulator’s website outlined three clauses. First, digital asset business operators are prohibited from taking deposits of digital assets, or depositing digital assets for loans or investments, and paying returns to depositors.

The prohibition also extends to depositors accepting digital assets as return payment. 

The third clause also precludes any advertising or soliciting of cryptocurrencies to the general public, “or doing any other act in the manner of supporting the deposit taking and lending services.”

This would include anything that facilitated what was banned by the first pair of stipulations, such as using alternative channels, like foreign deposit taking and lending service providers available through the operator’s platform or application.

With the prohibition, the regulator explained that it wanted to clarify that digital assets are not regulated by any authority, and that this lack of both domestic and foreign supervision “may lead to damage.”

It continued, “at present, there are many foreign service providers who face liquidity problems that have to stop their services and suspend the withdrawal of digital assets of customers.”

Zipmex issues

One such troubled exchange that was forced to halt withdrawals is Zipmex, which has operated in Singapore, Indonesia, Australia, in addition to Thailand.

When the exchange neglected to produce transactional information before a deadline, the SEC filed a police complaint against Zipmex last week. The regulator also requested clarity from Zipmex over a withdrawal freeze in July.


All the information contained on our website is published in good faith and for general information purposes only. Any action the reader takes upon the information found on our website is strictly at their own risk.

Source link

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.